Re: Updates Criteria Summary/Brainstorming

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/22/10 1:50 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 12:02:49PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> On 11/22/2010 11:56 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>>> It was my understanding of reading the complaints that this is what they 
>>> [complainers] desire - a reversal of what we require now (3 karma and/or 
>>> proventester if critpath).
>>
>> Critpath requires +1 proven tester and +1 anybody.  Total of +2.  Non
>> crit-path requires a minimum of +1 anybody or a 7 day timeout I do believe.
>>
>> I do not believe we require +3 anywhere.  We /default/ the karma
>> autopush level at +3/-3, but that's just a suggestion.
> 
> Afaik there is currently no distinction between the requirement for non
> crit-path updates and the karma autopush level. Therefore by default
> non critpath updates require +3 karma, unless this has been changed
> since the beginning for the update criteria enforcement.
> 
> Regards
> Till
> 

I swear I've been able to set karma levels at 1 for non-critpath updates.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux