Re: Updates Criteria Summary/Brainstorming

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 7:01 AM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Michal Hlavinka wrote:
>> this could help, but it's not always possible to add these test cases. One
>> example: imap server package - new bug that can corrupt mail folders in
>> some circumstances. Maintainer updates package and sets 'type=bugfix' in
>> bodhi, but not always it's possible to write down any test case. It's
>> still a bug fix and it's better to be delivered sooner than wait if anyone
>> out there get's his mail folders corrupted. Actual policy does not help
>> proactivity.
>
> Right, and the big point there should be that a bug which can corrupt mail
> folders should be fixed IMMEDIATELY, i.e. with a direct stable push! ANY
> testing requirement there is a failure.
>

Install package from updates-testing, then +1 to karma after it works
for you with your tests and normal workload.

Simple.

No need to foist possibly broken software on everyone.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux