On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 8:15 PM, mike cloaked <mike.cloaked@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> Good point ... was thinking it was a way to ensure anaconda keeps >>> pace but you're right ... it should follow the actual changes ... >>> >>> Do you have any suggestions how to manage ensuring that each ISO >>> snapshot has a working anaconda ? >> > > During the runup period to F14 release I published a method for taking > an iso and replacing the anaconda in the iso - which can then be used > for a test install. This is detailed in a posting around a month > before f14 GA if you want to check it out. > > This would certainly be a way to test anaconda with all other > components unchanged but it does need a current iso to be built on the > current package set. My original post is at http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2010-October/094752.html if you are interested. -- mike c -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
