On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 14:13 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > I DON'T want to get an upgrade such as the one from KDE 3 to 4, the one from > Amarok 1 to 2, the one from KDevelop 3 to 4, the one from GNOME 2 to 3 etc. > as a regular update! Those are what new releases are for! (And there's your > "clear identity separation".) Minor feature release upgrades such as from > Amarok 2.2 to 2.3 (which DON'T have feature regressions, configuration > incompatibilites etc.), on the other hand, are perfectly fine to push as an > update, since they're clear improvements (and actually also fix bugs in > addition to adding features). well, thanks for clarifying. I guess as you say then, the issue is just defining what a potentially troublesome update is. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
