Brad Smith <brads@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > When multiple versions of the same > > package are returned within a category, it should sort so that the > > "newest" package is displayed first. > > > > The query currently does "ORDER BY package.name, package.version, > package.release, package.arch", which should (and seems to) list > packages in descending version order. Would it be simpler if the package > list was not also sorted by arch, or are you referring to something > else? Won't quite work -- the alphabetical ordering of versions isn't necessarily correct wrt rpm's versioning. rpmvercmp is a bit more complicated, unfortunately. Chip -- Chip Turner cturner@xxxxxxxxxx Red Hat, Inc.