Re: sched_autogroup interactivity patch for the desktop

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 06:14:33PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:

> The kernel doesn't really have a notion of what a "session" is (only the
> audit subsystem kinda has), but if this grouping behaviour is supposed
> to be bound to a session, then attaching it to a TTY is a pretty shitty
> replacement.
> 
> Dhaval Giani pointed out to me that the same can be done from userspace
> simply by creating a cgroup for each session in the cpu hierarchy. Turns
> out systemd actually does pretty much that, except in the named systemd
> hierarchy. It is trivial modification to create a group in both hierarchies.

That's not inherently a problem though, is it? Even if we have this 
in-kernel, systemd can disable it at startup and implement its own 
policy. It just means that the default case is (arguably) saner than it 
currently is.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux