Re: Fedora 15, new and exciting plans (biosdevname)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 09:24:26AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> Also, I gotta say, it really shouldn't be LAN on Motherboard, since it's
> just an adapter, not actually a whole lan. It should clearly be NIC on
> Motherboard, or "nom". And then you could silkscreen lolcats on to the
> servers, which I think would be a win for everyone.

For the bike-shed-painting record, I'm kidding about the above, in case that
wasn't clear. I do think lom is a bad choice, and am not convinced of a very
compelling reason to not use "eth", but I don't think it's worth an
argument.

(But, c'mon: the first one could be 'nom', the second one 'nomnom', and the
third one 'nomnomnom'. Delicious!)

-- 
Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx>
Senior Systems Architect -- Instructional & Research Computing Services
Harvard School of Engineering & Applied Sciences
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux