Le Mar 16 novembre 2010 00:15, "JÃhann B. GuÃmundsson" a Ãcrit : > > On 11/15/2010 09:27 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> Nobody has yet proven that LVM is a problem > > Well if you don't consider what Lennart mentioned [1] as a con against > usage of lvm by default The con was the assumption that LVM init could not be fixed. And this was completely disproved later http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-November/145554.html LVM can and should be fixed at the init level (brtfs is only going to overlap with a little part of was LVM does, so taking it as an excuse to avoid fixing lvm init is wrong) -- Nicolas Mailhot -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
