Le Lun 15 novembre 2010 23:51, Karel Klic a Ãcrit : > > Dne 15.11.2010 23:04, Matthew Garrett napsal(a): >> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 05:01:30PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Matthew Garrett<mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >> Leaving the retracing at the user's end of things means that the user at >> least has a choice in the matter - I'm unlikely to submit any firefox >> crashes if I don't have an opportunity to look at what's in the >> backtrace. We can make symbols available for local tracing without >> forcing the user to download the entirity of the debuginfo, and that >> would seem a more reasonable approach. >> > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DebuginfoFS > > Agreed, debuginfofs will be better for many scenarios. > > Major advantage of the retrace server is that you can get a good > backtraces even from unfresh coredumps. And why can't this be done with debuginfofs ? It's the same data. -- Nicolas Mailhot -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
