Re: The new Update Acceptance Criteria are broken

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:54:28 -0500
Simo Sorce <ssorce@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Adam why should security updates wait at all ?
> Do you fear some packager will flag as security updates that are not ?
> Surely we can deal with such maintainer if that happens...

No. The issue is that in the past sometimes security updates have been
rushed out with no testing and broken things badly. ;( 

See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Lessons
For some small number of examples (yes, anyone is welcome to please add
others you have run into to the page). 

I know of at least dbus, bind, nss and a few others that were security
updates and pushe out with no testing and turned out to break things. 

Perhaps security updates could have a smaller timeout? 
Or a security group that tests them ?

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux