Re: The new Update Acceptance Criteria are broken

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 14:54 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:

> Adam why should security updates wait at all ?
> Do you fear some packager will flag as security updates that are not ?
> Surely we can deal with such maintainer if that happens...

I don't have a hugely strong opinion either way, but the stated reason
by those who do is that security updates can be broken just like any
other. We don't have a magic 'infallible' switch on packagers which we
toggle only when they're building a security update. :)
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux