On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 01:32:05AM -1000, Warren Togami wrote: > Gary Benson wrote: > >>We Currently use Jpackage.org for all our Java packages but it seems > >>that with FC2 onwards there are going to be horrible package > >>conflicts. > > > > > >At the very least you'll be able to avoid conflicts by simply > >uninstalling the FC2 Naoko packages. It's just me working on it at > >the moment, and my priorities are to get it working first, and to get > >it working without stomping all over JPackage second ;) > > Unless all jpackage packages have a higher epoch or version, simply Most will have a higher version as the effort making things rhug frienndly takes a lot of time. > removing FC2 packages will be problematic to maintain because any > package management tool (up2date, yum, apt, etc.) will be confused by > the situation. This is a really the first test case Fedora Alternatives I think, although to some extent implemenatations can co-exist with /usr/share/java and symlinks. The right people seem to be talking on jpackage-discuss - don't panic ;) Paul
