On 10/19/2010 11:28 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
>> Because it takes more engineering effort to keep it as a separate
>> partition, as evidenced by the number of bugs that keep appearing that
>> are only triggered by this niche usecase.
>
> And how many of those bugs are exclusively a /usr-is-separate problem
> vs. how many of them are didn't-anticipate-alternate-partitioning
> problems?
If I understand your distinction correctly, then the overwhelming majority
of them are the former.
> I don't understand how separate /usr can be the sole trigger for all
> these many bugs. The only type of bug I can see attributed only to
> separate /usr are bootup requiring things in /usr before non-root
> filesystems are mounted.
And that's exactly what gets hit over and over.
> I expect other bugs attributed to separate /usr are really problems
> handling non-default partitioning schemes of many kinds.
There aren't a lot of other bugs about it.
--
Peter
Power corrupts. Absolute power is kind of neat.
-- John Lehman, Secretary of the Navy, 1981-1987
01234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
