Once upon a time, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> said: > Because it takes more engineering effort to keep it as a separate > partition, as evidenced by the number of bugs that keep appearing that > are only triggered by this niche usecase. And how many of those bugs are exclusively a /usr-is-separate problem vs. how many of them are didn't-anticipate-alternate-partitioning problems? I don't understand how separate /usr can be the sole trigger for all these many bugs. The only type of bug I can see attributed only to separate /usr are bootup requiring things in /usr before non-root filesystems are mounted. I expect other bugs attributed to separate /usr are really problems handling non-default partitioning schemes of many kinds. -- Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
