On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Evan Dandrea <ev@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'm not challenging your point that the Fedora installer offers more complex > options. ÂI just wanted to clarify our approach, as our users are not screwed > in these circumstances, we just clearly separate their use cases to different > CDs. We struggle a lot with how to position multiple image targets effectively to appease both our existing vocal contributorbase and simutenously provide something that appeals to the yet-to-be-initiated. The default Fedora desktop livecd is meant to be the installer image for the "go with the defaults." novice user It's not clear to me that we need the traditional installer experience (ie non-live) that hides more than it already does. I'm not really sure we've identified a usage case for such a thing that shouldn't already be a target for the live image installer. One question for you. Do you have a process by which people coming to your web properties can attempt to self-select which install image they want before downloading one? Do you chart a course to guide users to make a decision on whether to download the alternative image before first attempting to use the streamlined live image? Or do users tend to reach for the alternative image only after they bump up against customization constraints in the live installer you provide? -jef -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
