Stephen Gallagher, Mon, 11 Oct 2010 08:34:18 -0400: > Sorry, I think I was confusing daapd with another (system-critical) > component. You probably need to contact the maintainer of the original > mt-daapd and make sure they're on-board with switching to this new > forked version, as well as trying to identify any applications that > depend on mt-daapd and work with them to ensure that forked-daapd either > won't break their packages or they can at least release updates > simultaneously. > > If you are in fact the maintainer of mt-daapd, the first part should be > easy. :) No I am not, but CC of the parent message was sent to mt-daapd-owner@xxxx MatÄj -- http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/, Jabber: mcepl<at>ceplovi.cz GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC My point was simply that such tax proposals [for Pigovian taxes compensating for the transaction costs] are the stuff that dreams are made of. In my youth it was said, that what was too silly to be said may be sung. In modern economics it may be put into mathematics. -- Ronald Coase Notes on the Problem of Social Cost -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
