-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/11/2010 08:12 AM, Matej Cepl wrote: > mt-daapd in Fedora (and EPEL) is nothing than life of pain (crashes, > sudden unexaplained stops, etc.) and its upstream is dead. > > There is now fork of it (http://blog.technologeek.org/category/hacks/ > forked-daapd) which shows some life and hope it could be acutally > maintained by somebody who at least pretends to know what he is doing (I > have no way how to evaluate his abilities in better way not being a C > programmer myself). > > Therefore I would suggest to rename and rebase mt-daapd in Fedora to > forked-daapd. > > I have created forked-daapd branch in fedpkg mt-daapd repo with forked- > daapd.spec and I have also collected all known to me patches against mt- > daapd (branches fedora and ensureUTF8; the latter I will try to push > upstream) to my repo git://gitorious.org/forked-daapd/forked-daapd.git > > Of course, I expect, that this will require new Package Review. > > Comments, objections? Does anybody else do the same? Being that it's a different upstream project now, you need to create a new package in Fedora. Once that's reviewed and included in the packageset, you should raise the question of default inclusion with FESCo. - -- Stephen Gallagher RHCE 804006346421761 Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkyzAPgACgkQeiVVYja6o6NqQwCfUa1tExxC8tcdGlrbklD/2hkW KZ4AoIX5XGR0MPDsZ9/yvNWYZg8E3xEa =RwZY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel