On 6 October 2010 23:25, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This isn't generally how we do things. We encourage people to mark bugs > as blockers; this constitutes *nominating* the bug as a blocker, it > makes it pop up for review at a blocker review meeting. We then usually > determine whether or not the bug meets the criteria during the review > meeting, collaboratively between...well, theoretically between qa, > releng and devel, practically between whoever shows up for the review > meeting. :) We would then give it the whiteboard field AcceptedBlocker > if we accepted it, or remove the Blocks: field and add the whiteboard > field RejectedBlocker if we rejected it. There is an outstanding bug with respect to the host name set in Anaconda that is not kept when using the Live CD. It has been fixed in Rawhide, the question is if it should also be fixed in F14. Its overall impact is low. Many people leave the host name as localhost - no impact. Others might have let's say a small home network with two or three PCs - it is straightforward to manually change the host name after installation. I am unsure however if this would impact sysadmins that have for example 10 or more PCs or servers on a network. Do they use Anaconda or Live CDs at all? Perhaps sysadmins would like to take a look at this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638634 -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
