On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 15:25 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 18:05 -0400, Brian Pepple wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 17:53 -0400, John Poelstra wrote: > > > --If you are the OWNER of one of these bugs, PLEASE add a comment to the > > > bug letting us know how things are going and what you are planning to do > > > next. I > > > > > 639730 :: MODIFIED :: empathy :: bdpepple@xxxxxxxxx :: Empathy fails to > > > connect to Google Talk :: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639730 > > > > This bug shouldn't have been marked as a blocker since it's doesn't meet > > the criteria for being a blocker. I've gone ahead and removed the > > blocker. > > This isn't generally how we do things. We encourage people to mark bugs > as blockers; this constitutes *nominating* the bug as a blocker, it > makes it pop up for review at a blocker review meeting. We then usually > determine whether or not the bug meets the criteria during the review > meeting, collaboratively between...well, theoretically between qa, > releng and devel, practically between whoever shows up for the review > meeting. :) We would then give it the whiteboard field AcceptedBlocker > if we accepted it, or remove the Blocks: field and add the whiteboard > field RejectedBlocker if we rejected it. My bad, wasn't aware how that was handled. Thanks for the heads-up. Later, /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bpepple gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
