On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 21:53, Hugo van der Kooij wrote: > On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Alexander Larsson wrote: > > > On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 00:04, Hugo van der Kooij wrote: > > > On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Eric Feldhusen wrote: > > > > > > > I've never tried these, but check out > > > > > > > > http://www.gnugk.org/ > > > > http://www.openh323.org/ > > > > > > Been there, tried it. But those buggers have an impossible way of > > > compiling which is rather incompatible with any package manager. > > > > How come we package openh323 in fedora then, eh? :) > > Beacause someone tweaked it to fit gnomemeeting. But in a direct email > conversation the packager said it was packaged just to fit gnomemeeting > but the package will not win any beauty contest. > > But as soon asi I want to compile gnugk I find that basic files are > missing from the openh323 package. However, all the changes was made with agreement from gnomemeeting packagers from most of the major distros, and since then most of the changes have been slowly fed back upstream. So, I consider this mostly a bug in gnugk not tracking openh323s path to sane packaging, with possibly a few bugs in openh323 packaging. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Alexander Larsson Red Hat, Inc alexl@xxxxxxxxxx alla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx He's a scrappy coffee-fuelled ex-con haunted by memories of 'Nam. She's a plucky winged doctor with a flame-thrower. They fight crime!
