Re: H.323 gatekeeper on FC1?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hugo van der Kooij wrote :

> On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 00:04, Hugo van der Kooij wrote:
> > > On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Eric Feldhusen wrote:
> > >
> > > > I've never tried these, but check out
> > > >
> > > > http://www.gnugk.org/
> > > > http://www.openh323.org/
> > >
> > > Been there, tried it. But those buggers have an impossible way of
> > > compiling which is rather incompatible with any package manager.
> >
> > How come we package openh323 in fedora then, eh? :)
> 
> Beacause someone tweaked it to fit gnomemeeting. But in a direct email
> conversation the packager said it was packaged just to fit gnomemeeting
> but the package will not win any beauty contest.
> 
> But as soon asi I want to compile gnugk I find that basic files are
> missing from the openh323 package.

Been there, same conclusion : openh323 and gnugk are a complete mess
when it comes to trying to getting any decent packages out of them.

Matthias

-- 
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Fedora Core release 1 (Yarrow) - Linux kernel 2.6.3-2.1.253
Load : 0.61 0.40 0.32



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux