Re: xulrunner 2.0 in rawhide (F15) bundles several system libs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Rahul Sundaram <metherid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  On 10/05/2010 06:26 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> Maybe I'm missed something, but there is a (relative) simple question
>> that always pops up in my head when I read things like this. I never
>> bothered to ask it in public, but I'll do now:
>>
>>  * Why haven't those that want iceweasel and icedove in Fedora not
>> simply invested some time and got them integrated into the repository?(¹)
>>
>> It wouldn't be the first (albeit it likely would be the biggest) fork
>> where we also still ship the original (dd{,_}rescue comes to my mind),
>> hence I'd assume the packaging guidelines do not forbid something like
>> that. Or do they?
>
> No but that would involve actual work rather than merely making the
> claim that software licensed under GPL/MPL is non-free if it doesn't
> allow the use of a name when patches are applied to it.
>
> Rahul
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>

I don't blanket label everything with open code as "free software".
Some stuff bundles things which make it non-free. Code open-ness !=
free. You can call Firefox open source if you want, but it's not free
software.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux