Re: x86_64 as Fedora's primary platform

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/28/2010 11:57 AM, drago01 wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 8:49 PM, John Reiser <jreiser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> A x86_64 kernel with everything else i686 [no 64-bit apps] can be good
>> non-virtually, too, particularly when it avoids 32-bit PAE for more than
>> 3.3GB of RAM.

> No it is pointless in 99% of the times, you lose stuff like:
> 
> SSE2 being part of the standard ABI and additional registers for no
> real gain. (which can result into none or huge performance differences
> depending on the situation).

Being able to run 3000 simultaneous processes (32-bit) instead of only
2400 processes (64-bit) can be an advantage that out-weighs the minor
losses to each individual process.  RAM is cheap [and a capital cost],
racks are expensive [and an operating cost for power, cooling, rent.]

-- 

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux