On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 8:09 PM, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 28 Sep 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote: > >> Richard Zidlicky wrote: >> > One issue - many people have a mix of systems not all 64 bit capable. As >> > long as the advantages are not overwhelming many of those will stick to a >> > single variant for practical reasons and obviously that can only be 32 >> > bit. >> >> I have a 32-bit and a 64-bit machine, I run the 32-bit edition on the 32-bit >> one and the 64-bit edition on the 64-bit one and I really don't see why I'd >> do anything else. >> > > We run 32 bit vms in Fedora Infrastructure a lot for purposes of memory > density, we do it based on what will be running on the host as it doesn't > always make sense to do so. It's worked out very well for us. That's a valid case where it indeed makes sense, but I assume the *host* is running x86_64. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
