Re: Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 10:24 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:

> This is reasonably easy to fix: we should do some testing and withhold
> packages from Rawhide if they don't pass some basic sanity checks
> (eg. does it boot, can an X server be started).

That's basically the proven testers process, which at present is running
around capacity trying to cover three releases (two current stable, plus
Branched). I'm really not sure we could manage another release,
especially one like Rawhide where people have a right to expect updates
to land quickly.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux