Re: Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 01:43:43 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:

> The Mandriva policy is a reasonable starting point:
> 
> http://wiki.mandriva.com/en/Policies/SoftwareMedia#Backports_policy
> 
> it's sketchy and not greatly written, but the basic idea is that
> backports should only be 'leaf' packages (things on which nothing else
> depends) and libs required _only_ by the packages that are being
> backported. Packages on which other, unrelated packages depend shouldn't
> be backported.

Sounds like the only way to package Firefox under such a backport scheme 
would be to bundle Gecko etc.

-- 
Michel Alexandre Salim
Fedora Project Contributor: http://fedoraproject.org/

Email:  salimma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  | GPG key ID: 78884778
Jabber: hircus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx       | IRC: hircus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux