2010/9/21 Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx>: > 2010/9/20 Michał Piotrowski <mkkp4x4@xxxxxxxxx>: >> Setting up "official" backport repo will avoid repos fragmentation. > > Another repository/branch inside Fedora infrastructure does not > automatically avoid the any of the potential problems that you would > want to lump into "repo fragmentation." You'd have to take great care > in crafting packing policy to prevent any repository interaction > problems concerning dependency chains, conflicts,obsoletes, parallel > installation, upgrade paths, etc. > >> Keeping all cool updates in one place appears to be a reasonable idea. > Define cool. Firefox 4, Postgres 9, Cherokee 2, OpenOffice 4, Duke Nukem Forever > Does this mean that uncool updates would be excluded as > a matter of policy? Yes. Most users don't care about libfoo 1.6.54 -> libfoo 1.7.0 upgrade. > I'm not sure we all live in a world where a PostgreSQL 9 backport is _cool_. It's cool if you have strange problems with PgPool > > -jef Regards, Michal -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
