MichaÅ Piotrowski wrote: > Ok, so maybe it's time to setup Fedora "backports" repo for these that > wants new and shiny Firefox 4, PostgreSQL 9 or whatever with big > number. > > I'm not a huge fan of huge updates in "stable" Firefox3->Firefox4, > Kde4.5->Kde4.6 etc. In fact I would prefer to avoid them. But > sometimes people want this latest and greatest, shiny :) > > Setting up "official" backport repo will avoid repos fragmentation. > Keeping all cool updates in one place appears to be a reasonable idea. > Am I right? How hard would it be to "cherry-pick" from this backports repository? To install a newer Firefox from there for example, but keep the PostgreSQL from the ordinary Fedora even if there is a newer one in the backports repository, and with a simple "yum update" receive bugfixes to PostgreSQL from fedora- updates and new Firefox versions from the backports repository? If the backports repository would be an "all or nothing" thing, or if cherry- picking would require special tweaking of Yum, then it's a bad idea. BjÃrn Persson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
