Re: Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Development discussions related to Fedora <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)
From: Arthur Pemberton <pemboa@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 00:45:45 -0400
Delivered-to: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1285043886.1511.29.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I apologize for interrupting this tread. I shall take my leave.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)
  - From: Michał Piotrowski
- Re: Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)
  - From: Arthur Pemberton
- Re: Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)
  - From: Gerald Henriksen
- Re: Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)
  - From: Jon Masters

Prev by Date: Re: Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)
Next by Date: Re: calculus of PT_NOTE "for GNU/Linux 2.6.32"
Previous by thread: Re: Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)
Next by thread: Re: Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux