On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 15:13:42 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: >> No, I'm not advocating PgSQL 9 for F14, however, it shouldn't be so >> far-fetched that Fedora could have any software at any time. > > A Fedora update policy is being hashed out, and even before that, the > consensus is really against introducing major updates in stable releases. > It's not really "anything goes" as your statement seems to imply. A parallel update is a major update requiring a 6 month wait in Fedora now? -- Fedora 13 (www.pembo13.com) -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
