On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 15:13:42 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > No, I'm not advocating PgSQL 9 for F14, however, it shouldn't be so > far-fetched that Fedora could have any software at any time. A Fedora update policy is being hashed out, and even before that, the consensus is really against introducing major updates in stable releases. It's not really "anything goes" as your statement seems to imply. > Expecting > people to adopt their own personal repositories for versions of software > that Fedora maintainers don't want to ship "just because" should be seen > as a bug against Fedora itself. /end-thread-tangent Well, we're not, thankfully, in the same situation as some other distro where each third-party repository overlap quite a lot because they rebuild, possibly unnecessarily, an entire stack of software. The personal repositories I've seen tend to be tightly focused -- Richard Jones' mingw porting work, spot's repo for bleeding edge packages that rightly are not ready for Fedora proper, etc. -- Michel Alexandre Salim Fedora Project Contributor: http://fedoraproject.org/ Email: salimma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | GPG key ID: 78884778 Jabber: hircus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx | IRC: hircus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
