On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 16:40:16 +0200, Christoph wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> since I keep offlineimap the same version for the latest stable (that I
> got my hands on) + devel versions, my fedpkg workflow looks like:
>
> 1. master> build package
>
> 2. f14> git pull origin master && fedpkg push && fedpkg build ...
>
> 3. f13> git pull origin master && fedpkg push && fedpkg build ...
>
> I think this is how git should be used in that case (no difference
> between all branches). But this means taking the release number from
> step 1 through all steps (e.g. building offlineimap-6.2.0-2.fc14 without
> ever building offlineimap-6.2.0-2.fc14). Is that ok in terms of fedora
> package policies?
Can't be answered. The two NEVR in your text are identical. ;-)
But: All what is important is that EVR for master > EVR for f14 > EVR for f13,
and that is true for your case when using %{?dist} in the Release tag.
Then your example will build offlineimap-6.2.0-2.fc15 > offlineimap-6.2.0-2.fc14 > offlineimap-6.2.0-2.fc13.
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
