Hi all, since I keep offlineimap the same version for the latest stable (that I got my hands on) + devel versions, my fedpkg workflow looks like: 1. master> build package 2. f14> git pull origin master && fedpkg push && fedpkg build ... 3. f13> git pull origin master && fedpkg push && fedpkg build ... I think this is how git should be used in that case (no difference between all branches). But this means taking the release number from step 1 through all steps (e.g. building offlineimap-6.2.0-2.fc14 without ever building offlineimap-6.2.0-2.fc14). Is that ok in terms of fedora package policies?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
