On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 13:18 +0100, M A Young wrote: > But you can base it on what bugs were raised or still open during the > alpha phase. If there were a lot of issues during the alpha phase then > that is likely to continue in the beta phase. That was why I was > suggesting you count all blocker bugs, not just those that are still open. > It doesn't guarantee that there will or won't be be any critical bugs but > it does give an objective measure of how stable and well tested the code > is. Not entirely: see my reply to your previous. Not all packages are equal from the point of view of 'susceptibility to blocker bugs'. anaconda wouldn't do well on a measure of 'how many blocker bugs are opened against this component in alpha' either, but it doesn't mean anaconda sucks and should be removed =) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
