On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 14:28 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
> On 09/09/2010 01:24 PM, Alex Hudson wrote:
> > A screenshot is marginally useful, but how do you give a good idea of
> > how the font works in different weights, sizes, and with different text
> > (particularly those fonts with good Unicode coverage)? I think it's
> > sub-optimal to say the least.
>
> You are going way to far here... for this purpose (normal users
> installing fonts) a PNG with the standard "The brown fox..." text in
> normal, bold and italic is enough.
I disagree with this. Even if we assumed the user is writing in Latinate
script (not using some non-Latin script, right-to-left, etc.), there's
nothing saying they're using basic letters.
Use case: someone wants to format a spreadsheet of numeric data,
and wants a serif font where the numbers don't descend past the
base line (this would disturb the rules and double-rules of
financial tables).
Use case: someone is looking for a font with common symbols
(webdings, wingdings, etc.), has picked the characters from the
character map and wants to see what they look like.
I would agree that a "The brown fox..." screen shot is better than
nothing, and better than the information available in PK right now,
sure. But that's not to say that's all a user needs or wants. That's
basically what the current non-rpm font installer does, and it's not
amazingly helpful.
Font selection is not an "expert" task either, it's about the first
thing people learn when using computers. I don't think the latinate
assumption holds, either - there are plenty of scripts Fedora users use,
and having a screen shot for each common one is just making a simple
task complex.
Cheers
Alex.
--
This message was scanned by Better Hosted and is believed to be clean.
http://www.betterhosted.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
