Le Jeu 9 septembre 2010 12:03, Richard Hughes a écrit : > > On 9 September 2010 09:52, Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> It needs works both packagekit-side and font packaging side, but there is >> absolutely no way I'm going to expand energy on pushing the packaging >> changes >> through FPC & other font packagers if there is no buy-in packagekit-side to >> make use of them. Unlike application desktop files, font preview has a >> single >> consumer, packagekit, so it's totally wasted work if the packagekit side is >> missing. > > I'm interested in font installing, but I think it might be better to > integrate this with app-install rather than packagekit, as app-install > has a pointer to a screenshot URL we can show in the preview window. Sure, I was using "packagekit" as a generic term for "desktop application that implements the gui foo stores". > This just means we have to treat fonts either as applications (and > thus need desktop files) or we can just maintain a separate datastore > and merge this with the fedora-app-install data before the package is > shipped. > > The latter is probably my preferred solution. I agree, I don't think fonts map really well to .desktop files (though that means the font descriptions will depend on the package summaries & descriptions to be translated, but most users will primarily care about the preview and not the text) Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
