On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Michael Schwendt wrote: > My update packages for k3b are in need of further reviews according > to the fedora.us package submission and QA policies. > > k3b 0.11.6 (one review) > https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1106 > > k3b i18n 0.11 > https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1341 > > Alternatively, if someone likes to take over the packages (I'm not the > initial packager and have prepared the 0.9.x and 0.10.x updates only), > that would be appreciated, too, as I would add the required review. > > > My motivation to review and approve new packages has reached an all-time > low, when I see that the very few packages which I maintain or which I > have brought into shape during QA, don't seem to get published. You're not alone in that. Looking at fedora-package-announce archives: Month Published packages March 2004: 2 February 2004: 14 January 2004: 20 December 2003: 34 November 2003: 64 That's a rather alarming trend :( Meanwhile the QA-queue keeps growing and growing, it's up to 374 entries. Now remember this :-P http://www.fedora.us/pipermail/fedora-devel/2003-June/001535.html How about a Fedora QA day? To - get packages reviewed and published - help new people get familiar with the process - Panu -
