Re: fedora mission (was Re: systemd and changes)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It is not meant to be a complaint at you or a request for you to do more
> work. It's a complaint at the state of the world. (Why not find the
> biggest windmill of all to tilt at?)

I didn't mean for you to think it was a complaint. If I actually had
developed anything significant in gourmet I'd be beaming with pride
with the notoriety.

Seriously though, there is a plugin system, it is possible to avoid
webscraping.  If there are recipe sites out there with documented APIs
we can get those sites their own site-specific plugin with a weebit of
effort without completely re-engineering how gourmet works.

Even then..if the API changes we are in the same boat with regard to
updates mid-release.

-jef
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux