Re: systemd acceptance, packaging guidelines (was Re: systemd and changes)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:32:32PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > This isn't personal. It's a list of requirements that indicate where we need
> > to be in order to ship systemd as the default in Fedora 14. It doesn't
> > matter whose "fault" it is -- if it doesn't work, we can't ship it
> > broken.
> Great, I geuss I'll become an X hacker then. Apparently if KMS is borked
> it's now my duty to fix it. Yay!

I just said it wasn't. 

But let me also repeat my the next paragraph, which you left out:

> Obviously if the item in question fails both with systemd and upstart,
> it's a different sort of blocker.


-- 
Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx>
Senior Systems Architect -- Instructional & Research Computing Services
Harvard School of Engineering & Applied Sciences
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux