On Tue, 24.08.10 16:54, Matthew Miller (mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > While I think this is a good idea I am concernced a bit that this makes > > me responsible for stuff I am not willing to take responsibility > > of. i.e. if something from this list is broken, but it isn't systemd's > > fault then this should not be a reason to drop systemd from F14. Also, > > some of this I am not really able or willing to test (iscsi...), so I > > don't want to be responsible to fix this. > > This isn't personal. It's a list of requirements that indicate where we need > to be in order to ship systemd as the default in Fedora 14. It doesn't > matter whose "fault" it is -- if it doesn't work, we can't ship it > broken. Great, I geuss I'll become an X hacker then. Apparently if KMS is borked it's now my duty to fix it. Yay! Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
