That would be all grand and spiffy if it were actually faster bootup.
Bootchart here reports that systemd is 8 seconds *SLOWER* than upstart. No idea why, but systemd just hangs for 8 seconds doing "nothing" that I can see. No logs anywhere that are meaningful. Default clean install from Alpha iso or Nightly livecd -- both do the same.
It is not booting faster or even the same speed.
I would like to see your bootchart for both if you report that systemd is actually faster at all.
-dj
ps: I should point out that it's 22 seconds to boot with upstart. +8 seconds is a significant percentage increase.
--
Scire ubi aliquid invenire possis, ea demum maxima pars eruditionis est
--Anonymous
-----Original Message-----
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:46:41PM +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:There is nothing wrong with using Ubuntu, if it servers their needs.
> for workstation most users already use ubuntu. why? because it's more
> user friendly.
If they like a faster bootup, then yes, they will. And I as a
> do you think workstation users will like this kind of changes?
workstation user like it.
As long as we diverge in the direction of progress, then yes, it is. It
> do you think it'll be good to diverge from all other linux distros?
is a core principle of Fedora. Also this diversion is the only reason
why there are several distributions. The change might even drive more
users to Fedora.
Yes, they get a faster bootup afaik and happier package maintainers. ;-)
> do you think workstation users will see any kind of uplift because of
> systemd?
Regards
Till
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
