On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 15:16 -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering <mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx> said: > > On Tue, 24.08.10 15:55, Matthew Miller (mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > This is a very big change. chkconfig has worked for a long, long time. Its > > > elegance and simplicity is one of the nice administrative features of Red > > > Hat based distributes. People like it. > > > > Yes, and they should continue to use it -- for sysv scripts. > > I thought the last big discussion resulted in agreement that chkconfig > and service should continue to work for all services. Is that not the > case? It should be. Yea it's wonderful that Open Source lets stuff get re-invented, but RHL, Fedora, RHEL, etc. has been synonymous with chkconfig for about a billion years now and you can't just throw that away without bothering a few people. You can throw it away, but you shouldn't do that in F-14, even if it means compatibility code, like the kind Microsoft probably hated writing as they killed off AUTOEXEC.BAT :) Jon. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
