Re: systemd acceptance, packaging guidelines (was Re: systemd and changes)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering <mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx> said:
> On Tue, 24.08.10 15:55, Matthew Miller (mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> > This is a very big change. chkconfig has worked for a long, long time. Its
> > elegance and simplicity is one of the nice administrative features of Red
> > Hat based distributes. People like it.
> 
> Yes, and they should continue to use it -- for sysv scripts.

I thought the last big discussion resulted in agreement that chkconfig
and service should continue to work for all services.  Is that not the
case?
-- 
Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux