Re: a note on order of arguements to systemctl command

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/24/2010 03:53 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 24.08.10 14:59, Matthew Miller (mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> 
>> The service command has a syntax like this:
>>
>>  service servicename action
>>
>> where as systemctl has a syntax like this:
>>
>>  systemctl action servicename.service
>>
>> This is inconvienient for the common case where more than one action is
>> performed in sequence on the same service, since with the first ordering,
>> one just hits the up arrow, ctrl-w, and then types the new action (with
>> tab-completion).
>>
>> With the systemctl order, one must first skip back over the first word,
>> which due to the awesome emacsness of bash keybindings is more of a pain.
>>
>> I'm not saying that systemctl's syntax needs to be changed. I am saying,
>> however, that it's important to get the service command working with
>> systemctl so that people can use that instead.
> 
> Interesting definition of "important".

FWIW, Lennart, I agree with him here. The smoother the transition we can
provide for existing admins, the better, and this is an obvious place
where we can do that.

~spot
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux