On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 03:04:43PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > As to not keep moving the goal posts for Lennart, I believe that some > group (perhaps FESCo) should come up with a set of "do or die" > functionality for systemd, that can be tested for at the test day. That > way the goals are clearly marked. If it passes, hurray! If it doesn't > pass, then FESCo would be able to give Lennart a timeline to make them > pass, or enact the rollback plan. Obviously this timeline should leave > enough time at the end of it to enact the rollback plan without causing > Beta to slip. Or FESCo could decide that systemd is worth slipping for > and thus enact a slip until systemd can pass the "do or die" test set. > > Either way, clearly mark the goals, let Lennart shoot for them. FTR, this sounds perfect to me. I am not opposed to systemd a priori. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx> Senior Systems Architect -- Instructional & Research Computing Services Harvard School of Engineering & Applied Sciences -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
