On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 15:48:14 -0700, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Meanwhile, back in the real world, it is effectively impossible to use > all sorts of useful websites without Javascript enabled. Even for Then don't use them. If sites don't get used they may stop requiring people to significantly reduce the security of their systems to use them. It doesn't even have to be all of them, just the ones that aren't that important. > Shipping a Firefox with no ability to use Javascript would be more or > less equal to not shipping it, frankly. No-one would use the thing. While I think Firefox could do several things to increase it's real security instead of it's apparent security, I was actually complaining about the server side. Sites that use javascript encourage people to leave it turned on and even optional javascript is bad. Other ways of doing things (xforms, css, server computation) should be used instead. (Things that are really applications used with a special trust relationship and not by the general public are different.) -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel