Re: git branch help?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 05:40 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: 
> Neal Becker wrote:
> > OK, got mercurial updated for devel, apparantly OK.  Now try to update
> > f13:
> [snip a bunch of git tribulations]
> 
> It's quite telling that the git workflow is so arcane and exotic that even 
> the maintainer of another DVCS cannot figure it out! Git just has to do 
> everything in its own bizarre, confusing and broken way. :-(
> 
I'm sorry that I'm getting emotional here, but this is getting too much
for me. Kevin, this is totally off topic here. Furthermore, git is not
bizarre, it's not confusing and it's not broken. I'm no VCS guru and I'm
still able to work with it without issues and, I have to say, I learnt
it faster than CVS (plus from the various VCS I had interaction with,
which is CVS, SVN, mercurial and git this one feels best to me, by
design). 

If you spent some of the time you have spent on bashing git on actually
learning to use git you'd be much better off.

If git was as that bad as you try to imply, I highly doubt gnome, kde
and others would switch to it so happily.

If you want to flame about git, please do it elsewhere.

Thanks,
Martin

PS: repeating a lie thousand times does not make it true

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux