Re: Is PulseAudio dead?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 On 08/03/2010 09:20 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> IMO,  if you want to be a co-maintainer,  you will have to coordinate
>> and work with the model preferred by the primary maintainer.   Otherwise
>> disputes will make the process worse and not better.
> This (or rather, the differences in update conception) is exactly why I 
> haven't applied for comaintainership of PulseAudio.

I believe a co-maintainer if he/she wants to collaborate wouldn't
constrained by differences in approaches and can participate and help
out regardless of that.  If you review bug reports, I suspect you will
find ways to help.   It just requires letting go of the notion that my
approach is the only right one. 

Rahul
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux