On Mon, 2 Aug 2010, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote: > > ----- "Carl G." <carl.gaudreault@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Well, i'm happy to be a bug triager so > > you can get "real work" done. /s > > > > Let me know if you need some help to > > make the stats looks pretty. > > Thank You Carl, this will help the community a lot and is a perfect example of why public emails work. > I think what Bob is meaning to point out is that it does seem like risky behavior for the upstream of a core system in Fedora to stop developing it and start developing a new core system. It's not 100% clear that's what is going on, but the thread that's been started does provide evidence that might be happening. Do we know if PulseAudio upstream is still self sustaining and healthy and that this lapse response is just a temporary thing? It's a legitimate concern considering how critical PA is. -Mike -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
