Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 01:31:47PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> For simplicity's sake we thought it would be smart to ensure that the
> unit names are actually identical to the unit configuration files they
> are configured in on disk. i.e. you'll find the configuration for a unit
> "foobar.service" in the configuration file "foobar.service". And for a
> socket "waldo.socket" in the file "waldo.socket". And so on.

Presumably we'll have smart tab completion which will make that less
painful. I actually like the explicitness of the .service extention, as it
makes a distinction between running a given binary daemon and running a
_specific configuration for_ that daemon.

-- 
Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx>
Senior Systems Architect -- Instructional & Research Computing Services
Harvard School of Engineering & Applied Sciences
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux